You have a software solution to introduce, within a limited span of time. For the purpose of convenience, you have used code which is convenient to use and implement. Had you devoted more time to the concept, you could have found the best possible solution. But instead, you have chosen to opt for a shortcut because that promises to yield faster result than the other solution, which would be effective in the long run. In this way, you incur a tech debt. That’s because, in due course of the time, you have to make up for the technical snag that has occurred.
Constraint of time
Technical debt also relates to another kind of a situation, where you have to face the repercussions of poor designing. Developers may be hurried into providing the market with a fast and a furious solution. So, they may be under the duress to build the software package first, and after that, they may resort to getting the solution tested. In a bid to building first and testing later, the developers may end up creating a software snag. But if you continue with the process of building first, and testing later, you will end up having a series of poorly developed software packages.
Resembles financial debt
Such a prospect, where you have a series of poorly developed software solutions will do you more harm than good. The situation is almost similar to getting into a vicious cycle of debt, where you are found taking one loan package, after the other without clearing your previous dues. Consolidate credit cards that come with low rates of interest may help you tide over the situation. Likewise, you can work towards consolidating the technical debt with the judicious implementation of a testing protocol. The thumb rule is simple, the next time, you introduce a software package, have it tested and scrutinized before giving it the market’s exposure. You can even check out for bill consolidation loan and know its benefits and how to go for it.
Priority to testing
In fact, the market analysts highlight the significance of the ‘testing first’ protocol. The concept goes a long way towards minimizing the technical debt. Secondly, the protocol also accounts for the high success rates of the software company. The companies needn’t sacrifice their agility. In spite, of not sacrificing their agility, the procedure ensures success. On the other hand, a series of poorly developed software leads to the wastage of resources. Most importantly, such a scenario contributes to the cause of customers’ dissatisfaction. So, by hitting upon a quick intermittent solution, you may think that you have managed to save your precious time. But later on, during the course of restructuring, or refactoring, you have to devote twice more time, than before.
Testing should be independent
During the stage of inception, you may have ignored the gaps, but now that you are taking care of the debt, and working towards refactoring, you must have a separate group of testers. In other words, it is important to separate the software builders or developers from the testers. Then, you ought to ensure that the testers conduct an in-depth independent scrutiny. Only an independent scrutiny can find out the lapses and loopholes, and thus provide you with a software package that is powerful to serve your long-term needs.